Objective Meritocracy: Yeah, Right

Most organizations I work with believe they are harbingers of objective meritocracy – with one major exception: the individuals inside those organizations that know they’ve been screwed over.  And at some point or another, that will mean just about all of us.

We know we don’t consciously hold or act on our biases. We’d like to believe we don’t have them. And all of us expend a lot of energy to convince ourselves and others that this is so. (For an in-depth explanation on this topic, watch social psychologist Jonathan Haidt here: http://bit.ly/z9seKN

In spite of our best intentions, our biases exist, and they continue to do insidious harm in the workplace. Studies continue to validate what we already know: when it comes to hiring, paying and promoting people, it’s rarely objective.

Here are three situations where I often see it played out:

The new boss
One of my coachees recently experienced a classic scenario:
A successful executive, well-rewarded for the past 15 years, is suddenly on the wrong side of the bias fence. His new boss has a new regime in mind, and he’s not one of her inside players.

But the boss can’t say this out loud. Instead, she sets up a double-bind where he can’t possibly win. They agree he will coach and develop his under-performers – two people he inherited and would never have selected (sound familiar?). Their performance is hurting the team’s overall ranking, and he’s been told he must get rid of them by year’s end as part of the company’s forced ranking performance system. This places him squarely in a values dilemma: “How do I authentically coach these people through a development plan knowing I’ll be cutting them loose before they have time to show improvement?

Meanwhile, his low team numbers are being used against him as his boss reworks her leadership team, even though there’s acknowledgement that he’s doing all he can under the circumstances to correct the inherited issues.

My hunch? His team numbers are irrelevant. She decided early that she wanted him out. Everything else becomes just a means to remove him from the team without any negative legal implications.

I suspect she feels she’s being completely objective in the process. As does he. Neither one of them would readily see the biases they both bring to their dynamic.

Gender bias
Yep, it’s alive and well. In spite of all the systems we set up to make pay, promotion and performance ratings look equitable, they just aren’t. And women leaders fully participate. A recent study from the Harvard Business Review gives us yet another glimpse into what we already know:  http://bit.ly/GCQ3h3

There are lots of ways we unconsciously compete and try to ensure our own organizational survival. We’ve gotten especially good at working the data so we feel we’re being fair and logical – even collaborative. It’s hard to recognize when decisions are becoming biased. It’s even harder to choose to point it out, especially when you’re part of the decision making group. It takes self-aware insight, and courage.

Peers that don’t like you
Okay, this can just get ugly. Just because we walk around in adult bodies doesn’t mean we left our junior high school selves behind.

It’s the little insinuation here, the questioning of skill there – those unexpected drill-down questions in front of senior managers meant to trip you up. The ones that could have been asked when you met with the person beforehand to review the presentation. Yea, that stuff.

What’s happening? Just the age-old attempt to diminish others, with a hope that it will somehow elevate the person doing the detracting? While most of us see through the most obvious examples of this, it’s not always so clear and straightforward. I’ve had countless coachees question their own sense of what’s going on: “I know it sounds like I’m being paranoid, but it sure feels like… ”

Since most of the people I work with are high-functioning, non-paranoid adults (as far as I can tell, anyway), together we follow their intuitive hunch to see if we can gain more clarity about what’s going on. We also seek to find more effective ways to interact with their detractor.

This leads us to the most important questions:
When is the detractor YOU? What can you do to make yourself more conscious of your unwitting biases? And in what situations are people trusting you most to uphold an objective meritocracy? How can you operate within this system at the highest levels of integrity and awareness?

Tags: ,

5 Responses to “Objective Meritocracy: Yeah, Right”

  1. garduri botosani 01. Apr, 2012 at 1:23 pm #

    I cannot WAIT to read more of this. I mean, you just know so much about this. So much of it Ive never even thought of. You sure did put a new twist on something that Ive heard so much about. I dont believe Ive actually read anything that does this subject as good justice as you just did..,…

  2. Austen Levihn-Coon 03. Apr, 2012 at 5:31 pm #

    I totally agree. Thanks for sharing Lori.

  3. @LoriBCollins 07. Apr, 2012 at 12:41 am #

    Appreciate this added perspective sent to me by an entrepreneur and ex-WWII Naval officer – thanks Wayne!

    I have an example of a new commanding officer who was “Regular Navy” coming aboard our ship after the Japanese peace. He was overnight going to change us from a Navy Ship operating as a Cargo Transport which we were, to operating like a Battleship. Utter confusion until due to brass polishing instead of maintaining Booms and Winches a Generals Jeep was deep sixed in Honolulu. To his credit he held a meeting of officers and ask them to indoctrinate him into the ways a Navy Cargo Ship carried out its assigned duties. The New Boss effect is determined by the willingness of the new boss to assess his organization prior to making changes and judging his personnel, and a lot depends on the personnel to be patient in judging a new boss. It is a two way street. Employees can scuttle a new boss just as surely as a new boss can as you say with a bias that can pick on and decide on employees he does not desire to keep on his team. If the new boss is worth his/her salt they will put a shield between them and those new under him to take time and determine the strength of those on the new team. If the new boss does not have that trait he/she will probably not last. Of course during this time things are not pleasant for the employees.

  4. Delma Platte 07. Jun, 2012 at 3:09 am #

    Pretty great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have truly loved surfing around your blog posts. After all I will be subscribing in your rss feed and I am hoping you write again soon!

  5. stafford loan amounts By year 06. May, 2013 at 8:30 pm #

    Fantastic blog! Do you have any suggestions for aspiring writers?

    I’m hoping to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you suggest starting with a free platform like
    Wordpress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m totally overwhelmed .. Any recommendations? Bless you!

Leave a Reply